<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rod Long on electoral politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://notreason.com/2009/06/22/rod-long-on-electoral-politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://notreason.com/2009/06/22/rod-long-on-electoral-politics/</link>
	<description>Abolition, Nullification and Revolution</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 04:50:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roderick T. Long</title>
		<link>http://notreason.com/2009/06/22/rod-long-on-electoral-politics/#comment-2096</link>
		<dc:creator>Roderick T. Long</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 22:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notreason.com/?p=722#comment-2096</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand your response to my comment.  Oh well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand your response to my comment.  Oh well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GS</title>
		<link>http://notreason.com/2009/06/22/rod-long-on-electoral-politics/#comment-2052</link>
		<dc:creator>GS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 23:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notreason.com/?p=722#comment-2052</guid>
		<description>I can understand that, anyway, thanks for the quick reply. Sorry to hijack the blog. 

Keep up the good work on the blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can understand that, anyway, thanks for the quick reply. Sorry to hijack the blog. </p>
<p>Keep up the good work on the blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dixie Flatline</title>
		<link>http://notreason.com/2009/06/22/rod-long-on-electoral-politics/#comment-2051</link>
		<dc:creator>Dixie Flatline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 22:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notreason.com/?p=722#comment-2051</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t know.  I am on vacation from the community.  I will be back next Monday.  Try asking Irenicus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t know.  I am on vacation from the community.  I will be back next Monday.  Try asking Irenicus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GS</title>
		<link>http://notreason.com/2009/06/22/rod-long-on-electoral-politics/#comment-2050</link>
		<dc:creator>GS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 22:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notreason.com/?p=722#comment-2050</guid>
		<description>LS, how long is my ban for?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LS, how long is my ban for?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dixie Flatline</title>
		<link>http://notreason.com/2009/06/22/rod-long-on-electoral-politics/#comment-2036</link>
		<dc:creator>Dixie Flatline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 20:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notreason.com/?p=722#comment-2036</guid>
		<description>I only assumed the trade-off you indicated.  I&#039;m quite sure Ron Paul as President would not be a manager, but an ideological spokesperson.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I only assumed the trade-off you indicated.  I&#8217;m quite sure Ron Paul as President would not be a manager, but an ideological spokesperson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roderick T. Long</title>
		<link>http://notreason.com/2009/06/22/rod-long-on-electoral-politics/#comment-2027</link>
		<dc:creator>Roderick T. Long</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 19:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notreason.com/?p=722#comment-2027</guid>
		<description>Well, it&#039;s worth noting that part of the vision of the slate I&#039;m running with is to separate the roles of Chair and chief administrator, making the Chair primarily an ideological spokesperson rather than a party manager.  So the trade-off is not quite what you may have been assuming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it&#8217;s worth noting that part of the vision of the slate I&#8217;m running with is to separate the roles of Chair and chief administrator, making the Chair primarily an ideological spokesperson rather than a party manager.  So the trade-off is not quite what you may have been assuming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
